±¹ÇÐÇö´ë¹®ÇÐÃѼ
Çѱ¹¸íÀÛ¸íÀúÃѼ
Çѱ¹»ç¿¬±¸ÃѼ
Çѱ¹¹®ÇÐÀüÁý
ºñÆòÄ®·³¼±
ÀÛ°¡·ÐÃѼ
ºñÆò½Å¼½Ã¸®Áî
Çö´ë½Ã¼±½Ã¸®Áî
¾ó·è¸»½Ã¸®Áî
³ì»ö¹®°í
û¼Ò³â±ÇÀåµµ¼
¿µ¹®ÇÐÃѼ½Ã¸®Áî
¼¼°è¹®Çнø®Áî
±³¾çÃѼ½Ã¸®Áî
·Î ±× ÀÎ
ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£
°³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¯°æ
-
ȸ¿øÁ¤º¸¼öÁ¤
-
ȸ¿øÅ»Åð
³» µµ¼Á¤º¸
-
ÁÖ¹®³»¿ª
-
µµ¼º¸°üÇÔ
ÇöÀçÀ§Ä¡ :
HOME
>
Çö´ë¹®Çבּ¸
°íÀü¹®Çבּ¸
Çѱ¹»ç¿¬±¸
±¹¾îÇבּ¸
¿µ¹®Çבּ¸
ÆíÁý¿µÀκ»
´ëÁß¹®ÇÐ
ÀüÁý/»çÀü
ÃѼ½Ã¸®Áî
±¹ÇÐÀÚ·á¿ø
»õ¹Ì
ºÏÄ¡´Â¸¶À»
L.I.E.
SVP
¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
[ÆÇ¸Å]
A Study on Teaching EFL Writing:Reading-Based Writing Instruction
ÆÇ¸Å°¡ :
21,000¿ø
(10%ÇÒÀÎ)
¡æ
ȸ¿ø°¡ :
18,900¿ø
ÁöÀºÀÌ : ±è¹ÎÁÖ
|
¹ßÇàÀÏ : 2018/03/30
|
ÃâÆÇ»ç : ±¹ÇÐÀÚ·á¿ø
ISBN : 979-11-89817-13-8
|
ÆÇÇü : ½Å±¹ÆÇ
|
ÆäÀÌÁö¼ö : 194ÂÊ
¼Ò°³Çϱâ :
ÁÖ¹®¼ö·® :
°³
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of reading-based writing instruction that incorporated intertextual and reflective-reading strategies with teacher feedback (IRRF) on the writing performance of Korean undergraduate students enrolled in English for General Purposes (EGP) course.
For 16 weeks, the study examined 102 EFL Korean college students¡¯ writing performance across the three following variations of reading-based instruction: no intertextuality, no reflective-reading
Min-Joo Kim
BA in English Literature at UCLA. MA in TESOL at NYU. Studied in Asian Literature & Culture at Columbia University, NY. PhD in English Education at Korea University.
Currently, Assistant Professor at Daegu University.
Contents ABSTRACT 3 CHAPTER I 11 1.1 Context of the Study 13 1.2 Purpose of the Study 27 1.3 Research Questions 28 CHAPTER II 31 2.1 Changes in EFL Writing Education 33 2.2 Current Theories about EFL Writing Education 35 2.3 Reading to Improve Writing 37 2.4 Intertextuality in Reading-Based Writing 52 2.5 Reflective Reading 58 2.6 Teacher Feedback 62 2.7. Type of Writing Education in EFL 69 2.8 Self-Awareness in EFL Learning 70 2.9 Self-Confidence in EFL Learning 71 CHAPTER III 73 3.1 Research Design 75 3.2 Subjects 76 3.3 Instruments 79 3.4 Administrative Procedures for the Experiment 83 3.5 Writing Measures 91 3.6 Data Sets and Analysis 95 CHAPTER IV 97 4.1 One-Way ANOVA on Students¡¯ TOEIC Scores before the Experiment 99 4.2 Quantitative Findings 101 4.3 Pearson Correlations between Evaluators on the Writing Performance Test 120 CHAPTER V 123 5.1 Quantitative Research 125 CHAPTER VI 133 6.1 Findings 135 6.2 Pedagogical Implications of the Study 137 6.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 139 REFERENCES 142 Appendix A: A Sample of PPT Lecture 174 Appendix B: A Sample of Short Answers 177 Appendix C: A Sample of Multiple Choice and True-or-False Questions 177 Appendix D: Pre-Writing Test 179 Appendix E: Post-Writing Test 180 Appendix F: Survey on self-awareness and self-confidence in English writing 181 Appendix G: A Sample from the Textbook 182 Appendix H: A Sample of Reflective-Reading Strategy 1 (Summarization) 184 (Chapter 1) Appendix I: A Translated Sample of Reflective-Reading Strategy 2 (Reading Journal) 184 (Chapter 1) Appendix J: Scoring the Writing Tests 186 Appendix K: Scoring Rubric for the Writing Tests 187 Appendix L: A Sample of a Grammar Lecture PPT (Chapter 1) 189 Appendix M: A Sample of a Grammar Handout (Chapter 1) 191
1.À߸øµÈ Ã¥Àº ±³È¯ ¹ÝÇ°ÇØ µå¸³´Ï´Ù.
2.´Ù¸¥ Ã¥À¸·Î ±³È¯ ¶Ç´Â ÀÌ»óÀÌ ¾ø´Â µµ¼ÀÇ ¹ÝǰÀ» ¿øÇÏ½Ç °æ¿ì ±¸¸ÅÀÚ²²¼ ¿î¼Ûºñ¸¦ ºÎ´ãÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
ÁÖÀÇ»çÇ×
±¸¸ÅÀÚÀÇ °ü¸®¼ÒȦ·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÆÄ¼Õµµ¼´Â ¹Ýǰ, ȯºÒ µÇÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
°áÁ¦ÈÄ 2~5ÀÏ À̳»¿¡ »óǰÀ» ¹Þ¾Æ º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
5¸¸¿ø ÀÌ»ó ±¸ÀԽà ¹«·á¹è¼ÛÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
(Á¦ÁÖµµ¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ µµ¼,»ê°£Áö¿ªÀº Ç×°ø·á ¶Ç´Â µµ¼±·á°¡ Ãß°¡µË´Ï´Ù.)
°áÁ¦¹æ¹ýÀº ¹«ÅëÀåÀÔ±Ý, Àû¸³±ÝÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
Á¤»óÀûÀÌÁö ¸øÇÑ °áÁ¦·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÁÖ¹®À¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÉ ¶§´Â ÀÓÀÇ·Î ¹è¼ÛÀÌ º¸·ùµÇ°Å³ª,ÁÖ¹®ÀÌ Ãë¼ÒµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
0
EA
no img